Human Ontology-Alien insemination--Cultural Traditions: Casts of Caste Consciousness

 

Human Ontology-Alien insemination--Cultural Traditions: 

Casts of Caste Consciousness

Assuming we are an alien inseminated genome into the anthropoid-hominid line and not some trick-babies unique cognitive and  insightful, nuanced toolmakers but the descendants of...

Yet, we navigate on the womb-level of our terrestrial genesis and suffer for doing so. The ills of the world don't have to be as they are perceived. They are so perceived because of the circumscribed default detainment in which we have placed our existence.

There are inevitable consequences for each state for which we choose. 'Materialism' with its kaleidoscope of options has a main function and purpose the consumption if not the control of the available substances. Consumption is for the transient pleasure. Control is for the assured access and specific utility. This sets up the tangible and intangible relationship disparities of having or not having juxtapositions within that materialistic kaleidoscope universe orientation. And many of you have found your adapted or accommodating, or comfortable niche in the menu of relationship positions. But that nested babble of mentality has show its limits-strains-fallibilities.

My proposition, from my own anecdotal phenomenology, is that we do have alternative as implied by Einstein's theory of relativity E=MC^2. Or as a materialistic objectivist would see it M=E/C^2: temporally defined materiality is the ends  for their energies. What I see as the fallacy in this approach is that the more the objectified material is their goal, they are precluding  what raw energy, per se, could be for them. They have put themselves within the inherently limited, by definition, objectified material.

I'm asserting that raw energy can change the nature of objectively sensed time. Serendipity and Synchronicity being the evidence of such instances of Time presenting to us manifestations that go beyond the physical probabilistic paradigm expectations. Such presentations, I suggest, are derived from minds incidentally conditioned to favor aesthetic intangible qualities-i.e., sensed feelings-as measures and standards of quantity, as well as quantity.

In doing that, those practitioners of 'radar feelings' initiate waves of visceral energy which coalesce around the  greater uninhibited use of feelings as their "kinetic expressions". Those 'kinetic expressions' become representations of the subconscious will, which in the synchronistic or serendipitous moment out competes the less focused waves of projected probability.

The cultural consequences of this interventional serendipitous or synchronistic action within the predominance of the material world is the calculus of decision-making that values essentials of function to the redundancies of style, which make up too many of the quality variables of materialistic choice. The non-obsessive and non-preoccupation with having the consuming or controlling leverage frees up the psychic energy for the subconscious to focus on the intangible qualities. That focus opens avenues of receptiveness and transmission that align with the universe's cosmic mechanics. Those mechanics involve the displacement of energy in more flexible ways than within the physical limits of materialism's 'kaleidoscope buffet'.

Such an acolyte of serendipity and synchronicity is mentally functioning within another medium-a different culture, a different cast(e) arrangement. The importance of the intangible meanings of things develops an intensity of imperative energy that such energy develops a momentum of its own. That momentum enables the molding of objective features of time to align, for the acolyte, the unsolicited but highly desired terms of choice.