Supernatural-Supranormal existential Interventions
After a series of adverse events on 7/22-2021- the birth date of my deceased #2, who was infamous for her unethical and amoral intentions and actions, plus the movie, 'FALLEN', with Denzell Washington, John Goodman, Donald Sutherland, plus the guy who played the lead in the 'Sopranos'-story of a malevolent spirit that can move from one body to the next to manifest its bad intentions-connected the dots for my own encounter with adverse times and malevolent people.Unlike the suggested implications of a spirit that can not only take anthropomorphic form at will, but can possess the unsuspecting host of its invasive, malevolent consciousness, I perceive an animate logic that is a pathological vector, like any microbe or virus that can be passed on. but this vector passes on by the sensory receptiveness of its host. It's origins are mostly the logic of the mechanical physics of its presentation to our sensory system that notes any tangible or intangible anomalies of its sensory field with which it may have some sympathetic resonance. that resonance is probably from earlier encounters with a related phenomenon.
I now can assert that whether from either the religious morality perspective of 'good' versus 'evil' or from the physics of evolving notions, the operative nature of its energy's momentum seeks to cannibalize the vulnerable states of supposed immutable precepts. Most 'immutable precepts' are narrowly structured and flawed operational cognitive constructs of behaviors that are not resilient, and so inflexible that they're vulnerable to the undermining corruption of the more versatile and unconstrained qualities of the nature of the amorally indifferent kinetics, per se, with which those sensory mechanism come in contact.
But there IS a state of an immutableness of dynamic of learning whose dynamism has an equal ability to change for its needed development. I think that quality is a serendipitously learned talent, possibly unintended at first. Then awareness comes with accumulated experiences that are organized in an associated and collated intelligible understanding for those predisposed perceptives.
My learning curve was serendipitously favorable. Without those favorable circumstances, I would have felt more coerced to accommodate myself to the ethos and protocols of others. But much like one of my electives courses that was a sociology course with 'the Lonely Crowd' as part of the syllabus, what ever notions of adaptation and accommodation to the the predominant ego-status mores that existed were dashed by what was taken as a critical indictment of my past accommodations to my parents and general social environment. In the past, I hadn't proactively asserted a more intense, focused, vigorous, and affirmative will and aspiration.
That book freed my focus and purpose from trying to be the mechanical 'adept' 'Stepford person' and more to the self-empowered, aesthetic artisan of his own construction of feelings and identity. It was the first steps on the path to being open to the notion that being on a sui-generis path that would evolve into my own 'immutable values', for which I'd develop an affinity. The DEFINING foundational question that's at the core of my now ongoing and present self-evaluation is: 'what meaning of relevance to MY LIFE, than some else's agenda am I giving the energy of my attention or conscious participation?
A college upper-class senior, who came and bothered to sit with me at the mid-point of my freshman year, provided his views on being a student of their own agency. It was an empowering moment. It was a pep-talk of such irreverence, my soul rejoiced at the possible prospects for me by following that advice. I made the intellectual abortion from the kinetic-driven mechanic for which the collateral ethics are an inconvenient burden. 'Meaning' means little, if solely based on materialism and its trappings. Meaning and its relevance became my driving motivation than seeking the promise of an unguaranteed abstraction of caveat-laden contingencies for future vocational states.
Meaning, contrasting with kinetics that led to de facto nihilistic collateral damage from a banal acceptance of conventions that 'the "greater good" of the ends justified the means', was both a preventive emotional therapy for me other than being another, clueless 'Willy Loman' adherent to the myths and platitudes for acceptance than as an explorer and discoverer of what I could be. By doing so I was posing a threat to the logic that had infestated and held others in a mesmerized obedience of anxiety for being seen to not be cohering, if not in full adherence to the system of logic that gelled the boundaries of conception into a confining matrix.
Y'all have encountered that preternatural presence some people can exhibit, so that they represent to you a 'force of nature', haven't you?
I'm talking about those people whose characteristics in life and then after they die have what seems to represent to be the same author of the otherwise ad hoc appearance of those characteristics. In the past you might have joked about how weirdly familiar the presence of that phenomena reminded you of them. I'm saying that 'them' may truly be 'the one' who is able to live on in other forms or possess others of less than focused intensity. They do that in the same way that in the temporal world tangible forms-be they institutions or countries- can take control over weaker, less focused and organized beings.
You could say that Trump (Donald, that is) is the kin of a Hitlerian line of descent that his father Fred Trump felt such resonance with that he imbued his son who was predisposed by his father's influence and others such as Roy Cohn with those traits. Trump acolytes have the similar predisposed disposition of the 'maester'.
Even I, and probably you, have the rhetorical lineage of those whose logic and thoughts hold much resonance. If we totally have adopted the dogma of that person or historical idea, we would affirmatively be dogmatically possessed by that person. My wife carries on the ethos of her 'dear departed mom', as probably some of you have with yours. You'd never think that your mother's or significant others consciousness possesses you in that way. Though outsiders would say, "She's just like her mom.."
This phenomenon of logic has the animate force of the emotions that initially radiated it as the transmission. The particular body of origin was just a convenient, incidental prop. The distinguishing nature of that 'prop' provides the avatar name: be it 'God', 'Evil', whatever. The tangible energy created is real, and as 'the formula, E=mc^2, states: energy and matter just switch forms. These forms are by formula eternal.
We are born into a media of 'forces' that are ready to pounce upon the unsuspecting, the disorganized conscientiously, and the unprepared. These are mostly the people who 'go-along-to-get-along'. For those renegades and heretic of us, we can feel the physical viscerality of our contemporaries and the atmospherics/metaphysics of those radiated metas of the friction sensed in our social environment, incidentally. Now consider manifestations of still organized conscious that has maintained its corporeal data base to navigate in haunts of its prior dimensions.
============================
For an enhanced audio and video premium version of this contact me in the comments section.
