Human Ontology-Alien insemination--Cultural Traditions: Casts of Caste Consciousness

 

Human Ontology-Alien insemination--Cultural Traditions: 

Casts of Caste Consciousness

Assuming we are an alien inseminated genome into the anthropoid-hominid line and not some trick-babies unique cognitive and  insightful, nuanced toolmakers but the descendants of...

Yet, we navigate on the womb-level of our terrestrial genesis and suffer for doing so. The ills of the world don't have to be as they are perceived. They are so perceived because of the circumscribed default detainment in which we have placed our existence.

There are inevitable consequences for each state for which we choose. 'Materialism' with its kaleidoscope of options has a main function and purpose the consumption if not the control of the available substances. Consumption is for the transient pleasure. Control is for the assured access and specific utility. This sets up the tangible and intangible relationship disparities of having or not having juxtapositions within that materialistic kaleidoscope universe orientation. And many of you have found your adapted or accommodating, or comfortable niche in the menu of relationship positions. But that nested babble of mentality has show its limits-strains-fallibilities.

My proposition, from my own anecdotal phenomenology, is that we do have alternative as implied by Einstein's theory of relativity E=MC^2. Or as a materialistic objectivist would see it M=E/C^2: temporally defined materiality is the ends  for their energies. What I see as the fallacy in this approach is that the more the objectified material is their goal, they are precluding  what raw energy, per se, could be for them. They have put themselves within the inherently limited, by definition, objectified material.

I'm asserting that raw energy can change the nature of objectively sensed time. Serendipity and Synchronicity being the evidence of such instances of Time presenting to us manifestations that go beyond the physical probabilistic paradigm expectations. Such presentations, I suggest, are derived from minds incidentally conditioned to favor aesthetic intangible qualities-i.e., sensed feelings-as measures and standards of quantity, as well as quantity.

In doing that, those practitioners of 'radar feelings' initiate waves of visceral energy which coalesce around the  greater uninhibited use of feelings as their "kinetic expressions". Those 'kinetic expressions' become representations of the subconscious will, which in the synchronistic or serendipitous moment out competes the less focused waves of projected probability.

The cultural consequences of this interventional serendipitous or synchronistic action within the predominance of the material world is the calculus of decision-making that values essentials of function to the redundancies of style, which make up too many of the quality variables of materialistic choice. The non-obsessive and non-preoccupation with having the consuming or controlling leverage frees up the psychic energy for the subconscious to focus on the intangible qualities. That focus opens avenues of receptiveness and transmission that align with the universe's cosmic mechanics. Those mechanics involve the displacement of energy in more flexible ways than within the physical limits of materialism's 'kaleidoscope buffet'.

Such an acolyte of serendipity and synchronicity is mentally functioning within another medium-a different culture, a different cast(e) arrangement. The importance of the intangible meanings of things develops an intensity of imperative energy that such energy develops a momentum of its own. That momentum enables the molding of objective features of time to align, for the acolyte, the unsolicited but highly desired terms of choice.

Physical (kinetic) and Psychological (emotional) Self-Determination Space

Though this had been an underlying, mostly subconscious issue for me for most of my life, I never applied or extrapolated it beyond 'The Golden Rule' to what another subjectively would objectively need.

 

 It wasn't until the strategic need for someone to have such a no-drama, operational space did I seriously review my own history of attitudes on the space I've given others. From hitting on the cashier or waitress to cat-calling at some fine-and-divine 'Missy' I encountered; it was seen as a "normal" male hormonal reaction to an alluring female.

I did give space to those who showed a fierce gravitas about their incidental focus and purpose and equally those who were busy with their job tasks. Yet, if not those of a projected fierce gravitas of themselves, I found my 'radar' alert for those who either projected a persona that involuntarily drew an unsolicited insertion into their physical and psychological space.

Now there were those who expressly and explicitly sought a particular subject or subjects to enter into their psychological realm of fetishes they had for themselves

 

When I was hormonally ignorant, innocent, and it was all 'rumor and hearsay' to me such personal advances into my psychological cognizance were seen as a rude invasion. Something that was lost as an aesthetic sensitivity when I realized the physiological pleasures that came with the consummation of such invasiveness. What was before categorized as strange looks 

became the look I sought as the 'signal to act'. Of course, knowing the nuances of the intents of those looks was its own index of categories for my own presumptions.

As I learned that my male arousal often dismissed or neglected to notice the contextual signals of such looks of interests. Few were for the catharsis of random lust. More likely they had a culturally  or individual mercenary ends in mind. That knowledge tempered any romanticism of 'ever-lasting love' to more predatory motivations for which a woman's psychological or physical space was a negotiation for what quid pro quo tangibles or intangibles were the woman's 'by any means necessary' end game. The flowers, candy, and doting words of devotion, though not yet dismissed as fantasy were being cast for the woman who'd be a needle in a haystack

 

What had become a negotiable infringement on someone's psychological and physical space was a cynical response to a perceived charade of representation. For someone 'to have the privilege' of a personal sacred physical or psychological space would be from status or circumstance, not a right. Existence had already become a usurpation of privacy by commercial, as well as governmental instrumentalities. Social media and artificial intelligence had access to our coming and goings. Who is he or she to think and expect some sacred privacy, when they themselves participated and enabled the very mechanism of the undermining of individual privacy.

 

People became the objectified specimens for other's utility. Thus, their psychological and physical space were fields of opportunity and exploitation. I, as part of the unwitting many, felt I was entitled by opportunistic circumstances to crowd into a space of interest. From the extremes of such unethics to the acknowledgement and  reverence of a psychological and physical space.

 

Having that psychological and physical space allows for an autonomy of recreational dimensions-figurative and literal. Having the physical space of autonomy provides, at the least, the absence of externally originated drama. One can then concentrate on their own objective circumstances and imperatives. Having a psychological space of autonomy is not only that state of direct mental harassment, but also not having the noise of environmental drama as part of your sensory topography.

.